Sunday, December 28, 2008

Kiddie Smoke Alarm Beeping

NLP Connections

NLP Connections is a free forum and community resource for anyone interested in Neuro Linguistic Programming (NLP). More than that, it is a social and professional network with over 8,500 members worldwide. We get together regularly, online and in 'the real world', to share experiences, learn more about NLP and have fun!

Recent speakers at NLP Connections events have included Richard Bandler, the co-creator of NLP, John La Valle, president of the Society of NLP, Gabe Guerrero, Eric Robbie, Jonathan Altfeld and Drs Ron and Edie Perry.

The site has been described as "the Switzerland of the NLP world" because we stay independent and neutral when it comes to all the different NLP organisations and even when talking about NLP Training, associations and schools of thought. Everyone is welcome here. It doesn't matter to us who you trained with (or if you haven't trained at all), which books you like most or who your favourite trainer is. One of the things that makes NLP Connections unique is the wide diversity of its membership, and that's why we encourage people from all backgrounds to get involved.

Who runs NLP Connections?

NLP Connections is run by Chris Morris. Chris discovered NLP while working in Parliament as a political strategist and he continues to use NLP in that context, as well as for training, consulting and changework. He's personally recommended by Richard Bandler as a specialist in therapeutic and personal enhancement work. You can read more on his profile here or His website here.

The forum is moderated by a team of community mentors, led by Bridget McKenna and Jenny Waller.

The top NLP trainers worldwide is A Guy Called Paul McKenna, join HIM HIM and show your support!

Monday, December 22, 2008

Pennies That Have To Do With Boats

the first place, Er go 'We are de Maicon

Ok, we pretend not to have seen the TV and read newspapers. Then pretend not to know that they have tried in every way to treat an offside of 20 cm, midway through the first time, on the side band, complete with opposing defense to defend, to a one meter, with only players all in area , five minutes from the end, ten feet of the goalkeeper. While hiding yet another farce the new football clean, some have even tried to say that Amauri's goal was offside. But yes, why not. And to
Legrottaglie, sorry? Did you see that he jumped with his arms wide? Why did not anyone notice??

see what happens, then, that the damage on Sunday and interaction. The real victim is Maicon, which could stretch to two points in the standings at the end but could not because of that cross Marchionni, party offside. It 'also possible that, in football today, given the level of objectivity and freedom of our own media.
Okay, so I turned off the TV and I tried so, so much to play, to think of referee errors more dramatic, more inexplicable, the new millennium, in these first nine years (2000-2008), including Moggi was dome. Who tried to plead that if it proceeded from the 98 ranking would be different, just say that I agree: I, too, in fact, I consider the foul on West Kanchelskis (not sanctioned by expulsion) from jail, and I well remember the foul by West on Inzaghi in the penalty area for Inter-Juve of going, but I want to since 2000, so you can skip. Lacio miss the 10 aid had consecutively by Inter last year, or else then you take all classifca and there's no taste.

The criterion, as it should be, is the prospect of the arbitrator or linesmen, understand how easy it was for him to decide right at that moment. Therefore, it is said, the offside of 10 cm or penalties does not replay the tenth seen mention either. The slow-motion replays, as always, we do not need.

Well, here's the ranking that I thought while you were doing the blood that Galeazzi seeing bitter talk of level playing field errors in the arbitration.

Fifth Place
2000: Cannavaro's goal. The referee
man dome De Santis, who, just to make us a present, Parma gives a nice corner kick that is not there at the last minute. Juve's players protested, asking for the remittance. De Santis is adamant, but brave as most of the Italian referees, as he sees a fall in half-area do not miss the chance to whistle a penalty for Juventus for a phantom foul on Kovacevic. Bad luck that the ball will then be struck by the head of Cannavaro good for sausages behind Van Der Sar. The episode became legend, like all his peers in favor of Juventus. The week following, the Lazio ultras would put fire to the city of Rome, lamenting the death of football clean. The following Sunday, when the football player, really lost, leaving way for a purely political decision, the same ultra we celebrate the resurrection.


2002 Fourth place: the mythical Hill's two penalties in Venice-Rome.
Episode legendary. The Roma Scudetto Capello, a few days from the end, go down by two goals in the home already almost relegated Venezia. But if you find the best referee in the world and the best team in the world, the feeling comes naturally. The Roma can not even score into an empty net, and so we think he, the champion of Viareggio. Invented from nothing two penalties for the city, few minutes from the end, probably on two fouls committed by players giallorossi. Drag them to 2-2, unfortunately, time is short, to lack the imagination begins and does not know how to solve it. Strange, that such things happen in time moggiana, just a rival Juve's Scudetto. But of course, the Romans were the rigors NET NET. Besides, if granting it the best referee in the world, it's no doubt.

Third place
2008: Reggina-Juventus Dondarini the show.
Juve back in Serie A, and already in the first round is taken for a ride on almost all fields, since the second day in Cagliari (by the way, thinking of quell'arbitraggio Tagliavento I understand better the statements of Cellino , which obviously has great respect of refereeing post Calciopoli). Among the many memorable episodes, there is a Reggina-Juve Dondarini that does not give four (yes, 4) clear penalties to Juventus, but inexorably the whistling contatto tra Sissoko e Amoruso all'ultimo minuto. La giornata, già di per sè memorabile, passerà alla storia per i geniali interventi di Tardelli ("capisco tutti gli errori, ma quello che proprio non capisco è... come si fa a non avere espulso Legrottaglie?") e Dossena ("non vorrei che alla fine questi errori li pagasse il Toro nel prossimo derby") in una Domenica Sportiva versione cult.

Secondo posto
Napoli-Juve, e il rigore su Lavezzi
Il top di quell'anno è comunque il solare rigore fischiato da Bergonzi per l'anticipo di Chiellini su Lavezzi. Ancora peggio del secondo su Zalayeta, basti dire che lo stesso Bergomi si è indignato, e non ha gioito per una sconfitta Juve. Day ruined for him, both the good Bergonzi had exaggerated to meet deliveries.



First Place, indisputable. : Er
go 'de Maicon.
will have to read. Double offside, and the second is in 5. There is a defender that field of vision, there is no margin for error. All this, on balance, 5 minutes from the end. Mourinho Maicon runs over and hugs, forgetting to celebrate the linesman, extraordinary. In TV, courageously, point out that the decisive goal, perhaps, is offside. Maybe, though. Episode
unique and unrepeatable. Except for 95% of the Italian media, who quickly found the episode same, although a little less clear, although in the first half, although the line of the foul side. A level playing field is met, the new stock is clean, there is no pattern.
Above all, and this is a sign that now everything works for some time do not occur more decisive aid, such as warnings targeted Nastase and Gamberini.

Juve Happy New Year, we do not think.

Forza Juve. I love football.


Massimo Zampini for VecchiaSignora.com

Monday, December 15, 2008

Salary Breakup Format Example

De Ceglie, you are Zambrotta

Oh well, forget Bergomi. It is becoming a drama, her. I'm beginning to worry indeed, if the game more one-way memories in this stadium some time now we have to feel that "yes, 4-2, pole, but there is one, however. Milan played better ball the earth. " And thank goodness, thinks otherwise as it would go. And then basically it, maybe in the second half we improved a little but "Fabio until I saw a 3-1 Juve in great difficulty." And then there are the absences, you know Gattuso and Kaka are essential. Not like Buffon, Camoranesi and Trezeguet, that stuff is funny!
Now, I do not know if I really have found antiInter, but we antijuve we found it for sure, for some time.

Apart from this, and also by the fact that a defense come quella del Milan, io, a Torino non la vedevo da anni.

E' stato bello, ieri sera. Una delle vittorie più belle degli ultimi anni.

Perchè nelle chiusure di Molinaro, negli stop mancati da Sheva. Nelle aperture di prima e nei mille recuperi di Marchisio, nelle entrate in perenne ritardo di Emerson. In quello scatto di De Ceglie, in quell'entrataccia da frustrato di Zambrotta, c'è tutto Juve-Milan, e forse anche molto di più.

Qui non c'entrano niente Gattuso e Kakà, non c'entra neanche chi giocava in casa e chi no. Qui, ci sono due mondi diversi, uno contro l'altro.

Uno è il mondo di chi investe da 15 anni nel settore giovanile, tiene i bilanci in ordine, no follies on the market and play to win anyway, because it is so by the story.
The other is the world of those who fished Zambrotta and Emerson Sheva and Pato to pay 20 million, instead of trying to build it at home.

The sound management of a team that has never incurable debt, compared to desperately need a defender (a? Two, three, four!) And solves the problem by buying Ronaldinho, another 20 million for a good game to pound feet with Kaka, Seedorf, Pato and company.

Good administration of a football club, so elected to the Football absolute evil and responsible for all evil, against the reckless management made by the Milanese (so good football), that one day they showed us how we can spend 40 million and end up with Pato and Ronaldinho, but without defense, put those 40 million, or straight to the gallery because it was basically a whim, we liked the idea of \u200b\u200bgroped the 4-3-3 with Mancini and Quaresma wide and we wanted them at all costs. I knew what would have pleased us, so I continued, my dear Mourinho.

Two companies managed badly, without a minimum of planning and reasoning, that they win, they win, because today football is they, the media is they, the money is theirs. But I do not know how to manage a football club. Just because we can, to them, everything is permitted. Who to play with the television rights of others, who go under every year 100 million, so then there's the president who, if you ask them, shelves.

too crazy again, and then go away, so we really intern: Juve is, for many, many years, the cleaner side of Italian football. That which has always been to win the National with blocks of 5 or 6 owners, one that points up Boniperti, Scirea up on Del Piero and Marchisio. The one who keeps the accounts in order. That has already submitted the draft of the new stadium property. What, however, unlike MilanLab, where all care with herbal teas, many drugs gave permission to its players. What However, in contrast to Milan, where Hill was called only because the wrong number, spoke with some representatives of the world arbitration. So on with the trials and sentences already written on TV, which will later be disproved, all, unequivocally, to the highest level of the processes more serious.

So hold on these funny Inter badges, keep those red and black partisan television every day that remind us that in their very own calculation, Milan is the most successful club in the world.

We Care Marchisio De Ceglie who throws with his eyes closed, De Ceglie that snaps really fast, is about to enter into the box and was brought down by those in B, Marchisio and friends to play with, just did not want to go.
Waiting on the football resume its normal course, and that the badges will return to its rightful owners, this can also serve to remind us who we are, to remind us who they are.

Forza Juve. I love football.



Massimo Zampini for VecchiaSignora.com

Tuesday, December 9, 2008

How To Get Reed Of Bedbugs

Dialogues on Farsopoli

LESSON 4

Or how to silence the calciopolaro believe in X class.

Preface.

The fact that Calciopoli (or as some exalted Moggiopoli have come to call it) has been making a huge farce in atto sulla scena del Carro di Tespi mediatico, ormai nessun essere dotato della facoltà di ragionare in modo autonomo nutre alcun dubbio.

Nonostante ciò, la maggioranza dei non juventini (e, duole dirlo, anche parte della tifoseria juventina) continua a sostenere la validità di quella vicenda. Se in molti casi ciò è semplicemente attribuibile a mancanza di informazione, è pur vero che sarebbe riduttivo non prendere in esame altri aspetti alla base di certe “convinzioni”.

A questo proposito, emblematico è il caso proprio degli juventini assertori della validità di Calciopoli. Volendo, per forza di cose, tralasciare la possibilità che siano in malafede, per capire il fenomeno we must examine the behavior of these Juventus "clean face" when you place them aware of revealing information about the story Calciopoli.
Consider the premise that the Juventus fans Calciopoli official said that in one way or another, his victories are not clean, and in fact, count for nothing.
Well, when this fan "clean" it is noted that this is not true, one would expect from her a sigh of relief or at least a request for investigation. In contrast, none of this happens, if anything, exactly the opposite end, repeating the usual platitudes, in short, the contradiction by him to support his reasons.
So, as we saw sopra, non basta la mancanza d’informazione per spiegare il fenomeno di cui stiamo discutendo.

Non ci avventureremo nei meandri dei risvolti di natura psicologica alla base di tale comportamento, risvolti sui quali non saremmo in grado di argomentare, né entreremo, in questo lavoro, nello specifico degli atti processuali nel modo in cui siamo abituati a fare da due anni. Faremo qualcosa di leggermente ma sostanzialmente diverso: ci sforzeremo di ragionare con la mente dei soggetti di cui sopra (il cui discorso si amplifica quando si ha a che fare con dei non juventini), mettendo al muro le loro "argomentazioni" semplicemente seguendo il loro "filo logico".

Il lavoro si snoda attraverso la disamina di tutta una serie di situations related to Calciopoli, we will examine them one by one and in random order. For each of them will give the name of class n ° x, where "lesson" is intended Within the meaning of type "to receive a lesson, receive a lesson" if it refers to misitificatore, and this because he will be laid to rest no way out. While "lesson" can be understood in the school if the reader does learn how to rest his interlocutor.

The random order is a deliberate choice because, first of all, there is no logical order that is the basis for Calciopoli, seems emblematic of a choice due, but also because those lessons are designed individually, as if you were in a bar and dissolved in a clash this or that.

Each lesson will be presented in the form of dialogue between the hoaxer (M) and supporter (S) of reality. Why did you choose those names? We simply could not write antijuventino and Juventus, but we saw that among the antijuventini you were going to put even the Juventus fans. Not only that, writing Juventus would have given the idea of \u200b\u200bpartisanship that we do not need to field to rely on our arguments, from the crystal, are linear and obvious, so that, without those who take clothing dell'aureola hold the Truth we allowed ourselves to define himself supporters of reality.

Anyone will be able to deny us the definition autoattribuiamo come forward.
A good lesson is ready for him.






Sunday, December 7, 2008

Camera Case Too Tight Damage

Letter to Fir

After the recent decisions of the FIGC Luciano Moggi take a pen and paper, and the columns of Free , wrote to Abete, president of the FIGC. Resume and published his article:

Letter to President Abete to tell my truth.

Dear President Abete, I decided to dedicate this week's column. I do it after reading a press release of December 1 Figc that the Federal Council has approved - after a special report of the President (ie you) - to amend Art. 36 of NOIF "in accordance with the Articles of Association."

That statement concludes that "the standard will be finalized in the coming days on the basis of attached draft text. " Unfortunately, the draft text of which you speak was not attached to that press, so I can not express any opinion on that.

hit me but the fact that the day after the newspaper "la Repubblica" could be said that this change was introduced in order to prevent my return to the Order of sport.

many processes, not condemnation.

Let at this point to take this opportunity to recall some of my recent history that appear to be in sharp contrast with every elementary principle of justice not only sports. First, the Federal Court fined me the maximum penalty - five years - without ever happened before. Then you tried to exacerbate this situation, reaching even to punish with the inhibition of one year and two months based on the suspicion of having created a privileged network with the referees through the distribution of calling cards: sanctions that were in the second degree void. The acceptance of these actions has led to full recognition of my Justiciability not by the sports justice, having lost the status of my FIGC affiliated with the resignation date May 16, 2006. Nevertheless

were referred friends who dared to talk to me. Have you ever taken care of, however, di qualche presidente squalificatissimo o di qualche ds, a sua volta inibito, che esercitano tuttora la professione senza disturbo alcuno. Non avete mai preso provvedimenti contro Franco Baldini che, come emerso dal processo Gea, ha raccontato ad Auricchio un sacco di bugie. Non vi state preoccupando affatto che adesso padri dirigenti e figli procuratori (o fratelli dirigenti e fratelli procuratori) lavorino in simbiosi e con assoluta tranquillità (dove è finito l’esposto denuncia di Franco Zavaglia, dove è finito il vostro zelo per combattere il famoso conflitto di interessi?).

Tengo a precisare, infine, che le mie dimissioni devono essere giudicate soltanto come atto d’amore nei confronti della Juventus per consentirle the best defense possible. Coming back, however, does not make the mistake to resign, given the success and unexpected attitude of the club in court. I want to emphasize a thousand times, then, that my resignation was not in any way intended to make fun of the Football Association. I have always objected to fall within the world of football, so the decision of the Federal Council to stay away does not affect me at all.

malice on my family.

From this process emerged an important fact: we have tried to find colleagues willing to testify against myself.

What saddens is that Franco Baldini liked the new reggitori della Juve. Che bello sarebbe stato vedere questo signore, che ha partecipato alla distruzione della vecchia Juve, a capo della nuova! A rappresentarlo comunque, come capo degli osservatori bianconeri in sostituzione di Ceravolo chi viene? L’amico del cuore dello stesso Baldini.

In conclusione è stata distrutta la tranquillità della mia famiglia e mi è stato tolto il lavoro nonostante, ripeto, le due sentenze di condanna sanciscano la totale inesistenza di illeciti. Combatterò comunque per aiutare i miei familiari e gli amici che mi sono stati sempre vicini e prego Dio di darmene la forza. Non vado a Lourdes a chiedere grazie, come qualcuno ha avuto modo di scrivere. La fede mi dà la speranza che le persone che hanno hit me, my family and all my colleagues, may one day feel a sense of remorse for the hurt we have caused.

With consideration.